top of page

Proposal Graphics That Ensure Compliance with FAR Guidelines

  • Writer: Patriot Data Graphics
    Patriot Data Graphics
  • May 21
  • 2 min read

Stack of papers stamped "COMPLIANT" with a seal, next to a laptop and color wheel. A glowing checkmark hovers above. USA flag in background.

In government contracting, compliance is just as important as content quality. Even the most well-written proposal can be downgraded or disqualified if it fails to meet the requirements of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR).


While many teams focus on narrative compliance, proposal graphics are often overlooked yet they play a critical role in readability, structure, and persuasion. Importantly, the FAR is currently undergoing significant rework, so it’s essential to stay up to date on rule changes and evolving requirements.


This article breaks down how to design proposal graphics that meet current FAR standards, ensuring your submission remains compliant, clear, and competitive.


1. Understanding FAR Requirements for Proposal Graphics

The FAR outlines broad rules for federal procurements, including proposal structure. While it does not issue graphic design rules per se, it emphasizes:

  • Clarity and readability All materials must be easy to interpret.

  • Accessibility and compliance Digital proposals must meet standards like Section 508 to ensure equitable evaluation.

  • Conciseness and relevance Extraneous visuals can be flagged as unnecessary or noncompliant.


Agencies often add RFP-specific rules, such as:

  • Limits on the number and type of graphics

  • Font size, color use, and spacing standards

  • Submission formats (digital, printed, or both)


Tip: Always review the RFP instructions carefully to align with FAR-based agency requirements and monitor updates as FAR revisions move forward.


2. Essential Compliance-Friendly Proposal Graphics

Strong, compliant graphics can improve evaluator comprehension and boost scoring.

  • Process Flow Diagrams: Illustrate workflows and methodologies; keep them clean and easy to follow.

  • Tables and Comparison Charts: Show alignment with RFP requirements and highlight differentiators.

  • Organizational Charts: Display team structure and key personnel roles, focusing only on RFP-relevant staff.

  • Gantt Charts: Visualize timelines, milestones, and deliverables.

  • Risk Management Heat Maps: Identify risks and mitigation strategies at a glance; use color carefully for grayscale readability.


3. Common Compliance Mistakes

Avoid these frequent missteps:

  • Noncompliant Fonts and Colors: Always match the RFP’s specified formatting requirements.

  • Overloading Graphics with Details: Keep visuals focused and digestible.

  • Ignoring Section 508 Accessibility: Ensure alt text, high contrast, and meaning beyond color alone.

  • Disregarding RFP Graphic Limits: Confirm placement, count, and appendix requirements.


4. Best Practices for FAR-Compliant Graphics

  • Use high-resolution visuals

  • Stick to a professional, limited color scheme

  • Ensure clarity in both print and digital formats

  • Align visuals tightly with narrative content

  • Label all charts, tables, and diagrams clearly


By following these best practices, you’ll improve readability, maintain compliance, and strengthen your competitive edge.


Conclusion: Compliance-Ready Graphics Can Improve Proposal Success

Graphics are more than visual enhancements they’re critical tools that improve clarity, demonstrate professionalism, and boost evaluation scores. Staying compliant with FAR and RFP-specific guidelines ensures your visuals enhance rather than risk your proposal.


Action Tip

Before submitting your next proposal, conduct a graphic compliance check:

  • Do all visuals align with RFP and FAR guidelines?

  • Are graphics labeled and easy to read?

  • Have color contrast and accessibility been considered?


By embedding strategic, compliant graphics into your proposals, you’ll create compelling submissions that stand out and help secure contracts.


Want help designing FAR-compliant graphics that deliver results?


Connect with Patriot Data Graphics at www.PatriotDataGraphics.com to strengthen your next submission.

 

References

  • Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) § 15.305, Proposal Evaluation Procedures

  • U.S. General Services Administration (2022), Proposal Formatting & Compliance Best Practices

  • Section 508 Standards, Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards

Comentários


bottom of page